|
|
| Author |
Message |
Ken O
electronics forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 116
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:30 pm Post subject:
Power supply 3
|
|
|
Hi,
Automatic shut off.
I was considering two method for an automatic shut off of a battery charger.
I was looking atthis one from Tony's
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/bcgla.htm
When the battery is charged Q1 takes over and bypass the battery. But i am
seeing that the positive of the battery is also onenctd to the emitter of
Q1, and the collector to the ground of the battery, Doesn'that mean it is
still charging a bit ?
Also this one thats uses a relay. Is there also one more stable then the
other.
And also I was told that I should add a short circuit protection, in case i
hook up the battery at the wrong pole.
For this I thought of adding a 15 volt zener diode on the ground cable. So
if someone conencts it to the positive of the battery no harm done. Or
possibly a diode and a buzzer from the ground to the positive, so when
hooked up in reverse, the buzzer will sound.
???
ken |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ehsjr
electronics forum Guru
Joined: 03 May 2005
Posts: 863
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:00 am Post subject:
Re: Power supply 3
|
|
|
Ken O wrote:
| Quote: | Hi,
Automatic shut off.
I was considering two method for an automatic shut off of a battery charger.
I was looking atthis one from Tony's
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/bcgla.htm
When the battery is charged Q1 takes over and bypass the battery.
|
No. Read the description at the site.
But i am
| Quote: | seeing that the positive of the battery is also onenctd to the emitter of
Q1, and the collector to the ground of the battery, Doesn'that mean it is
still charging a bit ?
|
It is still charging a bit, but not because of Q1.
| Quote: | Also this one thats uses a relay. Is there also one more stable then the
other.
|
You did not post a reference to what you call "this one".
| Quote: | And also I was told that I should add a short circuit protection, in case i
hook up the battery at the wrong pole.
For this I thought of adding a 15 volt zener diode on the ground cable. So
if someone conencts it to the positive of the battery no harm done. Or
possibly a diode and a buzzer from the ground to the positive, so when
hooked up in reverse, the buzzer will sound.
???
ken
|
For reverse polarity protection:
N/O v====o-----+
Charger (+)-----------o---- |
+---------o---^ N/C |
| |
[Buzzer] --- |
| | /| |
+-----+-----| / |---|<---+
| |/ | D1
| ---
| Ry1
|
Charger (-)-------+---------------------- to battery (-)
If you hook it up properly, the relay will energize,
closing the N/O (Normally Open) relay contact and
completing the circuit from the charger to the battery.
If you hook it up backwards, the relay will not energize,
but the buzzer will have a complete path through the N/C
(Normally Closed) contact to the charger. It will sound
if the charger is turned on.
There are more sophisticated circuits, but I get the sense
you would prefer something simple like this.
Ed |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ken O
electronics forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:12 am Post subject:
Re: Power supply 3
|
|
|
"ehsjr" <ehsjr@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message
news:YOUvg.301$Wf.1@trndny01...
| Quote: | Ken O wrote:
Hi,
Automatic shut off.
I was considering two method for an automatic shut off of a battery
charger. I was looking atthis one from Tony's
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/bcgla.htm
When the battery is charged Q1 takes over and bypass the battery.
No. Read the description at the site.
But i am
seeing that the positive of the battery is also onenctd to the emitter of
Q1, and the collector to the ground of the battery, Doesn'that mean it is
still charging a bit ?
It is still charging a bit, but not because of Q1.
|
Because I am a bit confused for the gate 1-8 on the LM 301.
Even with the description, I do not understand.
I think because of the capacitor, the charger do not turn back on.
otherwise it would.
| Quote: | Also this one thats uses a relay. Is there also one more stable then the
other.
You did not post a reference to what you call "this one".
|
oups...
http://www.elecdesign.com/Files/29/1823/Figure_01.gif |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ken O
electronics forum Guru Wannabe
Joined: 27 Oct 2005
Posts: 116
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 12:16 am Post subject:
Re: Power supply 3
|
|
|
"ehsjr" <ehsjr@bellatlantic.net> wrote in message
news:YOUvg.301$Wf.1@trndny01...
| Quote: | Ken O wrote:
Hi,
Automatic shut off.
I was considering two method for an automatic shut off of a battery
charger. I was looking atthis one from Tony's
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~antoon/circ/bcgla.htm
When the battery is charged Q1 takes over and bypass the battery.
No. Read the description at the site.
But i am
seeing that the positive of the battery is also onenctd to the emitter of
Q1, and the collector to the ground of the battery, Doesn'that mean it is
still charging a bit ?
It is still charging a bit, but not because of Q1.
Also this one thats uses a relay. Is there also one more stable then the
other.
You did not post a reference to what you call "this one".
And also I was told that I should add a short circuit protection, in case
i hook up the battery at the wrong pole.
For this I thought of adding a 15 volt zener diode on the ground cable.
So if someone conencts it to the positive of the battery no harm done.
Or possibly a diode and a buzzer from the ground to the positive, so when
hooked up in reverse, the buzzer will sound.
???
ken
For reverse polarity protection:
N/O v====o-----+
Charger (+)-----------o---- |
+---------o---^ N/C |
| |
[Buzzer] --- |
| | /| |
+-----+-----| / |---|<---+
| |/ | D1
| ---
| Ry1
|
Charger (-)-------+---------------------- to battery (-)
If you hook it up properly, the relay will energize,
closing the N/O (Normally Open) relay contact and
completing the circuit from the charger to the battery.
If you hook it up backwards, the relay will not energize,
but the buzzer will have a complete path through the N/C
(Normally Closed) contact to the charger. It will sound
if the charger is turned on.
There are more sophisticated circuits, but I get the sense
you would prefer something simple like this.
|
I am just starting out, I dom not know what is better, Actually I found only
one circuit, which was extremely complex and had other components beside it,
So I did not bother.
so what does the other sophisticated circuits have more?
ken |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Google
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
The time now is Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:01 am | All times are GMT
|
|
Copyright © 2004-2005 DeniX Solutions SRL
|
|
Other DeniX Solutions sites:
Unix/Linux blog |
Unix/Linux documentation |
Unix/Linux forums |
Medicine forum |
Science forum |
Send and track newsletters
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Forum index
»
Electronix
»
Basics
